Celtic Alliance Clan » Forums

Sep 04, 2009

Poland should hopefully be defeated shortly. I just killed his king in battle and now I am besieging the city containing his prince.

Aug 06, 2009

Poland up

Aug 14, 2009

Aug 16, 2009

I must say this hotseat moves forward faster than expected with fast steps to

GRAND FINALE :D

LET THE SLAUGHTER BEGIN ! Very Happy

Sep 03, 2009

Aug 16, 2009

Why HRE will not offer some peace to Poland ? Guys don't be warmongers let have some quality gameplay, Poland is already beaten on its knee, I think he deserves some peace agreement.

Aug 06, 2009

saspi i think the king was in the castle/city? had he been attacked 2 turns in a row?

Sep 04, 2009

That army came in as reinforcements, so I did not technically attack the army twice.

Aug 14, 2009

In attacking the units stationed around the city you knew this would be a way of you being able to attack my king twice in a row. Technicaly you did not attack him but as I have no control over the AI I could not stop him being drawn into battle. Im intrested to know if you can move your defeated retreating army again next turn As you did last turn. I have not been able to move a single unit that has been defeated and retreated in a previous turn, has anyone else.

Aug 06, 2009

maybe its to do with turn order?

Sep 04, 2009

I found it sort of odd that I was able to move the army, so I'm assuming it was a glitch in the game. It did not really matter though because the army was right next to my city and you were not allowed to attack it anyways, so I would have moved it inside the city regardless.

Sep 03, 2009

I think that what the rules say is that if your army is defeated you can move it only to retreat, thus it cannot attack another army if it was defeated the previous turn. Ex. problem between Gothic and Death:
http://celticalliance.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=1209&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=90

Ranger attacked the same army against the rules because he fought against them in open field twice in a row. You can only do a second attack if its a siege battle.

Ranger says he technically didnt attacked Polands army, but even if that were to be true, the AI broke the rules by attacking ranger with a Polish army that had been previously defeated (see beggining of post).

So there is actually a sort of loophole-exploit on the rules. Imagine that instead of a 200 army outside the castle, Poland had just moved a 1k army there. Ranger wouldnt have been able to attack it because it would have broken the rules by forcing a defeated army to attack him.
However.... I just realized Ranger can avoid breaking the rules by sieging the castle with 1 unit, and attacking the army outside with the rest of his army. That way he will only attack the 1k army.
So there is no actual loophole-explpoit on the rules Smile

Aug 16, 2009

Poland shall be granted peace . He suffered a lot, let him lick his wounds.

Aug 14, 2009

Aug 07, 2009

Lith up

Donate

Discord

User Info

Teamspeak